Jul 1, 2016 - Explore monce jo's board "Peter Eisenman", followed by 190 people on Pinterest. During his tenure at the Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies, Eisenman became renowned as a theoretician of architecture. Beginning in the late 1960s, Eisenmanâs ideas took form in a series of numbered housesâe.g., House I (1967â68) in Princeton, New Jersey, House II (1969â70) in Hardwick, Vermont, and House VI (1972â75) in Cornwall, Connecticut. In his early work he sought a purely âselfâreferentialâ architecture, a removal of all normative meaning from architectural form. Eisenman has always been deeply interested in the problem of form in architecture and has constantly challenged the classical concept of it. Despite his significant impact on architecture through both built and theoretical works, most studies of Peter Eisenman's career focus on either one aspect or the other. By structuring this volume around the concept of form, Stefano Corbo links together Eisenmanâs architecture with his theory. Updates? So, Cannaregio marked the transition from interiority to exteriority and Eisenman abandoned Chomsky or Slutzky, in order to find a more appropriate language for explaining the times in which he was living (The Cold War). Author of, Architect Peter Eisenman discussing his inspiration for the University of Phoenix Stadium, from the documentary. Eisenman's philosophy of architecture could not be more opposed to mine. Philosophy Of Peter Eisenman His differentiation between a deep and superficial structure would be the main reference for Eisenmanâs discourse: the American architect in fact distinguished between superficial/sensorial aspects (colour, texture, shape, and so on), and deep aspects (frontality, compression, and disjunction). Our editors will review what youâve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. ArchDaily 2008-2020. In the 1960s he developed a theory of architecture antithetical to most modernist theory. Architecture thus became for Eisenman a tool to reflect upon the instability of history. From Formalism to Weak Form: The Architecture and Philosophy of Peter Eisenman, the world's most visited architecture website, © All rights reserved. Moreover, every project contains a different cultural substratum that needs to be brought to light. He published Diagram Diaries in 1999. Peter Eisenman was a notable American architect, renowned for his radical designs and architectural theories. You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! From Formalism to Weak Form: The Architecture and Philosophy of Peter Eisenman argues that form is the sphere of mediation between our body, our inner world and the exterior world and, as such, it enables connections to be made between philosophy â¦ â¢ Purposely ignoring the idea of form following function, Eisenman created spaces that were quirky and well-lit, but rather unconventional to live with. All images are © each office/photographer mentioned. In 1987, for example, the Spanish architect Ignasi Solàmorales tried to describe the crisis of Modernity, by introducing the concept of weak architecture. Rather than isolating and analysing every element in its autonomy, From Formalism to Weak Form has been structured around a series of keywords or concepts that help to define a heterogeneous and interconnected cartography that is detached from any hierarchical configuration. The adjective weak was also linked with the idea of truth, at the point in time when it lost all its traditional and reassuring characteristics. Each of them has constituted the mutant epidermis of Eisenman’s theoretical corpus, based on philosophical references and provocative statements. Considered one of the New York Five, Eisenman is known for his writing and speaking about architecture as well as his designs, which have been called high modernist or deconstructive. At the beginning of the 1980s, the Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo initiated the term pensiero debole (weak thought), in order to justify the shift from the modern to the post-modern.